Regarding the manipulation of science in the toxicity evaluation of glyphosate, much has already been said: the Monsanto papers, the copy/paste affair from the dossier into the RAR and other incidents show that industry has largely influenced the analysis of available science in the dossier to guarantee the approval of its pesticide product for market use. In commissioning this report, Générations Futures and PAN Europe wanted to find out how studies showing negative effects of glyphosate are wrongfully (unscientifically) dismissed during the pesticide safety evaluation procedure. For this reason, a consultant was hired4 to conduct an independent analysis of the Risk Assessment report on glyphosate. The results reveal that animal studies that report adverse effects following exposure to glyphosate in four categories of toxicity (genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, toxic to reproduction and endocrine disruption) are repeatedly dismissed from the risk assessment procedure of glyphosate without a valid scientific argument being provided.